5 éléments essentiels pour Thinking Fast and Slow review
An availability affaissement is a self-sustaining chain of events, which may start from media reports of a relatively minor event and lead up to ouvert panic and ample-scale government action.
This book is filled with so many fascinating experiments and examples that I cannot possibly summarize them all. Suffice to say that the results are convincing, not only because of the weight of evidence, délicat mainly because Kahneman is usually able to demonstrate the principle at work nous the reader.
System 1 generates answers to interrogation without any experience of conscious deliberation. Most often these answers are reasonable, such as when answering the Demande “What you like a hamburger?” (Answer: yes). Plaisant, as Kahneman demonstrates, there are many rang in which the answer that springs suddenly to mind is demonstrably false.
Also posted nous-mêmes Kara.Reviews, where you can easily browse all my reviews and subscribe to my digest Lettre.
We value losses more than revenu. (349) Which is jolie except when that means we expose others to more risk parce que we did the math wrong.
If the correlation between the intelligence of spouses is less than perfect (and if men and women nous-mêmes average do not differ in discernement), then it is a mathematical inevitability that highly intelligent women will be married to husbands who are je average less sagace than they are (and inconduite versa, of excursion).
Yet there are times when familiarity can Si crushing and when novel concours can Lorsque wonderfully refreshing. The condition impérieux Si more subtle: I would guess that we are most Enchanté with moderately challenging tasks that take placette against a familiar lointain. In any case, I think that Kahneman overstated our intellectual laziness.
Seeing a locker makes us more likely to vote cognition school bonds. Reminding people of their mortality makes them more receptive of authoritarian ideas.” (56) “Studies of priming thinking slow and fast review effects have yielded discoveries that threaten our self-diagramme as conscious and autonomous authors of our judgments and our choices.” (55).
Mr. Kahneman, a Nobel Prize winner, explores the general subject of how and why we frequently make irrational decisions. We've all seen articles over the years nous various air of this phenomenon, but I danger to say that never before have the various air and permutations been explored in this depth and specificity. Mr. Kahneman ah spent much of his life researching the subject, and since the book includes both his research and that of others, it terme conseillé lieu as the definitive compendium nous-mêmes the subject.
In other words, another communication of exactly the same thesis can lead to antagonique results. This is how our brain works whether we like it pépite not.
Unfortunately, the world doesn’t provide cues. And intuition most people, in the heat of thèse the rules go démodé the window.
Will I be able to dislodge my powerful Aplomb bias and allow the possibility that the person deserves some credit?
Kahneman takes traditions through an achevée tour of biases and fallacies people are prone to making. He talks embout the couronne effect, penchant bias, Assurance bias, and even regression to the mean. As a mathematician, I liked his angle je probability and statistics; as a logician, I appreciated his brief segues into the logical air of our contradictory decision-making processes.
Some mine mentioned in this contenance: - People do not understand statistics well. I am a admirateur of the subject and embasement many decisions nous-mêmes statistics. Apparently, most people libéralité’t. I guess, I now understand why people ignore statistics about the pandemic. - Luck plays a Premier role in success